Thursday, February 26, 2015

Audience Analysis of 1960s TV

http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/29/showbiz/tv/sixties-five-things-television/

The 1960s allowed for a much more widespread audience to be introduced into the world of television. Prior, TVs were more of a luxury and not many families were able to have one. In the 60s this all changed when television became a staple in the home. Because there were no "for mature audiences only" warnings, most shows were family oriented such as "Leave it to Beaver". If there was not a wholesome program on, it was the news on one of three channels which was mostly aimed toward adults. In modern times, there are a variety of shows and so many are not appropriate for the entire family. With the hundreds of channels offered now, it seems like there is something for everyone. Later in the 60s more variety entered television to reach more accepting audiences, "Star Trek" introduced the first interracial kiss/ relationship on TV. This touched more diverse audiences, and allowed for more African American viewers. With all of the technology available now, TV is falling behind, but in the 1960s it was definitely the front runner.
-Kara Gans

3 comments:

  1. I agree, the incorporation of the television in almost every home in the 1960's was major for American's, as it allowed them to be better connected to the rest of the world. It also became another form of bonding or family activities, as families would gather together to watch programs. Today, the "tradition" still sticks as families will still set times to watch television or movies all together. Today, I agree it is much more easier to find shows for the entire family to watch, as we have ratings nowadays.

    ReplyDelete
  2. straight to the point. I really like this post because every sentence seemed like it added relevant information with no repeats. my only critique would be to hyperlink the CNN article to make it more convenient.

    ReplyDelete
  3. straight to the point. I really like this post because every sentence seemed like it added relevant information with no repeats. my only critique would be to hyperlink the CNN article to make it more convenient.

    ReplyDelete